I am aware of an anthropologist or two who have taken this entheogen medicine and had insightful flashes and insights – vs. brightly colored geometric prisms often associated with psychedelics – that helped them understand how our culture is evolving and devolving.
From an American perspective, they note how our society values an independent identity (self) far more than most other countries do. This can cause plenty of difficulty, especially when trauma enters the picture.
As highly enculturated Americans, we tend to see things through a singular lens.
It’s all about me – what happened to me, who is at fault and needs to be blamed,
and what my painful experiences have irreparably done to my self-esteem.
Personalizing trauma too much can make adverse experiences more damaging. In
many cultures the conceptualization of trauma -- particularly its presumed and
long lasting effects – is not as highly elaborated and amplified as in the U.S.
MDMA can activate another way of thinking. Another way of seeing, interpreting,
and integrating painful life events. And another way of knowing ourselves.
First
we need cultural assistance to help us see beyond our personal and singular
importance.
Second, a little more help is needed from the right hemisphere of
our brains to view life from a bigger, interconnected and global perspective – if
not beyond that. If we weren’t so caught up in such a narrowly confining and
scripted view of emotional pain, we might even laugh at some of the absurdities
of our ethnocentric and egocentric view of things. As comedian Emo Philips
quipped, “I used to say that the brain was the most powerful organ in the body.
Then I realized who was telling me this.”
Excessive individualism can be an impediment to recovering from trauma.
Psychologist Robert Levine, author of
Stanger in the Mirror, wrote: “If you happen
to have been raised as a full-blooded individualist…consider that numerically
you’re the freak. This independent view is pretty much limited to the United
States and part of Europe. The
interdependent view predominates to one degree
or another almost everywhere else.”
Anthropologist Steven Heine adds, “More than 80 percent of the world’s cultures
find it hard to conceive of a truly separate self.” In other words, if we define normal as “the norm,” then the notion of an independent self is clearly abnormal (Did you get that? If not, please read again.). Regarding ourselves as community members or global citizens however, might help us see our life experiences from a less personal and therefore less painful perspective. Perhaps our egocentrism adds to the impact of trauma. One must recognize the constrictiveness of select cultural dogma and how that can accentuate the harmful effects of trauma.
The Japanese word for “self” is
jibun, which literally translates as “one’s share” -- the implication being the share of the social context in which one exists. Outside this framework there is no true self.
Similarly in southern African countries you will hear the word
ubuntu which roughly translates, “I am me because of you; no matter how different we are, we complement and complete each other.”
” In other words I can discover myself through experiences with you whether you seem nasty or nice. This even applies to perpetrators of crimes. Nothing happens in a social vacuum and we, as individuals, do not rise above everyone else as superior entities.
Head to Peru where the Q’ero shamans teach the concept of
yanantin, which is their way of referencing interpersonal complementarity; each person’s uniqueness helps to perfect their social counterpart as a result of relational interplay. Another Q’ero word is
masintin that stresses the chemistry between people. This responsivity teaches us how to socially dance with others, as a part of the whole. And the dance often includes temporary pain (not necessarily an alien concept like chronic PTSD) before a person can, as an integrated member of a supportive community, see their best personal qualities ripen (post-traumatic growth, PTG).
MDMA seems to open the mind to other ways of thinking and knowing, including the ability to distinguish ourselves as part of an interconnected web of humanity, or for that matter, a closely linked member of the animal world. This
unity consciousness serves as an antidote to the effects of trauma; it can help us to see the big picture and recover more quickly.
American sociologists are starting to write (summarized in a NYT’s article) about something they call the “culture of complaint,” a victimhood culture with a parasitic psychological community that, in some instances, has created a billion dollar “grievance industry.” There is a fine line between fighting for victim’s rights and unwittingly promoting a victimhood culture that make us hyperaware of this one aspect of life while tacitly discouraging victims from recognizing realistic hope for a resilient response.
Susan Clancy, Research Director of the Center for Women’s Advancement, penned the book,
The Trauma Myth. Completing a ten year study of victims at Harvard, she noted three things.
First, almost every victim of childhood sexual abuse said they were damaged by the experience.
Second, and to her surprise, she found the psychological and cognitive impact victims reported had nothing to do with trauma; the cultural context determined how persons perceived themselves and interpreted their experiences. Rather than reporting fear, shock, or physical harm at the time the abuse occurred, 92 percent of the victims described their predominant reaction as one of confusion, often accompanied by embarrassment. And our culture promulgated much of the confusion about what persons were expected to feel.
Third, she discovered, “There appears to be no direct, linear relationship between the severity of the abuse and the psychosocial difficulties victims experience in adulthood.” Clancy’s insights may be extrapolated to suggest that cognitive clarity and psychological peace – of the kind MDMA victims commonly report – can seal and heal the event. Personal truth matters, our societal dictums, not so much.
****************
“What hurts most victims is not the experience itself, but the meaning ascribed to the experience. It is the retrospective [culturally influenced] interpretation of the event that mediates subsequent impact. Because it is backwards, the trauma model is not just failing to help victims; it is actually causing some of the harm it was supposed [to] explain by simultaneously exacerbating the victim’s damaging beliefs.” Susan Clancy, Ph.D.
Download Article as PDF